Anima Books
books by holistic veterinarian Dr Christine King
Miscellany
Cataracts
Can we prevent, or at least delay the onset and slow the progression of, age-related cataracts in our animals?
I just read an interesting review on cataracts by a veterinary ophthalmologist at Queen's Veterinary School Hospital, University of Cambridge, UK:

Cataracts are cloudiness or opacity of the normally clear or transparent lens that is suspended behind the iris and which enables us to focus our vision on specific objects, whether near or far.
The iris is the colored part of the eye. My irises, for example, are blue. The iris in most domestic animals contains some amount of brown pigment, so it ranges in color from a bright mustard-yellow or amber to a dark brown-black.
The pupil is the hole or slit in the center of the iris. Like the aperture of a camera, it is not an actual structure, but rather the gap through which light enters the eye, to be received by the cells of the retina in the back of the eye, after passing through the normally clear lens.

Cataracts are most apparent when the pupil is dilated, thereby revealing the opacity in the lens behind it.
Below is a montage of cataracts in different animal species, revealed by various degrees of pupillary dilation. Except for the bird, each photo is a close-up of an eye, with some part of the eyelid(s) showing to help you get oriented.

a. Diabetic cataract in a 12-year-old Springer Spaniel. [Pupil partially dilated.]
b. Inherited cataract in a 6-year-old Labrador Retriever. This particular type is called a posterior polar subcapsular cataract. [Pupil widely dilated.]
c. Corticosteroid-induced cataract in a 7-year-old crossbred dog on oral prednisolone for 2 years. [Pupil widely dilated.]
d. Diabetic cataract in a 13-year-old domestic short-haired cat. [Pupil widely dilated.]
e. Mature cataract in a 22-year-old Thoroughbred horse. [Pupil, a horizontal rectangle in horses, not dilated.]
f. Post-traumatic cataract in a 4-year-old American scrub jay. [Pupil widely dilated.]
Professor Williams begins:
❝ I'm not sure what I find more remarkable. That evolution could produce a transparent structure suspended in the middle of the eye, perfectly engineered to focus light on the retina, or that this structure manages to stay transparent in a large proportion of individuals for the majority of their lives. ❞
He goes on to describe some unique features of the lens:
❝ … light shines through the lens for all the time we are awake potentially exposing the proteins in the lens to the risk of photo-oxidation that majorly contributes to ageing of other structures such as exposed skin …
Yet the crystallin [crystal-like] proteins in the middle of the lens are the same ones that were formed in utero [before birth]. The collagens so regularly arranged in the cornea gradually change over time but those crystallin proteins in the equally transparent lens have no opportunity to be removed and replaced should they be damaged. ❞
In other words, the lens proteins we're born with have to last us a lifetime, whereas the equally transparent proteins in the cornea (the clear, thin dome at the front of the eye) are replaced as needed.
So, taking good care of our lenses needs to start when we're young, or at the latest in our middle years, rather than waiting for our vision to be compromised by lens opacity. The same goes for our animals.
For example, I've been wearing UV-protective sunglasses and a shade hat whenever I'm out in the bright sunlight ever since my grandfather had his first cataract surgery.
That was the first warning shot across my bow that I have a family history of cataracts.
Did grandpa simply not protect his eyes from UV light well enough, or were there other factors at play?
Causes of cataracts
Prof Williams briefly reviews the various known causes of cataracts in people and domestic animals, the seven Ds:
1. Daylight — exposure to UV light
2. Diet — particularly antioxidant intake
3. Diabetes — persistently elevated blood glucose ('sugar')
4. Drugs — chronic corticosteroid ('cortisone') use
5. Dehydration — severe and/or prolonged dehydration
6. DNA — genetic predisposition
7. Damage — trauma to the eye
The importance of this article for me is that it provides us with some clues about how to prevent, or at least delay the onset and slow the progression of, cataracts in our animals as they age. Now in my early 60s, I was paying attention for myself as well. I don't ever want to need cataract surgery!
I want to focus (no pun intended! ☺︎) on the first two, as they involve things we can do ourselves to help protect our animals' lenses as they age. The rest are either out of our hands or they involve or require veterinary care.
Daylight
Repeated exposure to bright sunlight, particularly the ultraviolet (UV) end of the spectrum, damages the crystalline proteins in the lens, a process known as photo-oxidation.
(More on oxidation as a biochemical process in the section on diet.)
This is one of the main causes of age-related cataracts in people and animals.
As horses generally spend more time outside during the day than small animals such as dogs and cats, they may be the more useful domestic animal species in which to examine how much difference UV light exposure makes to the development of cataracts.
horses
Prof Williams briefly discusses a study involving American Quarter Horses in two different countries:
* Brentwood, Essex, UK — 104 horses
* Dallas, Texas, USA — 102 horses
All of the same breed, the horses were kept in similar environments, had similar turnout (time outside) schedules, and were fed similar diets. However, their exposure to UV light was dramatically different between the two locations.
Latitude refers to distance from the equator, measured in degrees North (northern hemisphere) or South (southern hemisphere). Latitude and cloud cover determine the average hours of bright sunlight per month over the course of a year:
* Essex — lat. 51° North, average 127 hours of sunlight/month
* Texas — lat. 32° North, average 237 hours of sunlight/month
Compared with the strength of 'incident light' (i.e., sunlight) at the equator:
* Essex — 54% light strength
* Texas — 84% light strength
That is, light strength in Texas was only 16% less than that at the equator, but in Essex it was about half that at the equator.
Percentage cloud cover over the two locations was difficult to compare from meteorological data, given the relative rarity of dense cloud cover in Texas compared to Essex. However, the averages were calculated to be:
* Essex — 75% cloud cover
* Texas — 15% cloud cover
So, a conservative estimate for the increased solar radiation in Texas compared to Essex suggested that the Texas location had at least 3 times as much UV radiation throughout the year.
What did this study find?
Across all ages, there was a higher incidence of cataracts in Texas:
* Essex — 24% of horses had at least one cataract (i.e., in at least 1 eye)
* Texas — 58% of horses had at least one cataract
In other words, the risk of developing a cataract was 2.4 times higher in Texas than in Essex.
The age at which 50% of the group showed signs of cataract (termed the C50) was much lower in Texas:
* Essex — 20 years of age
* Texas — 10 years of age
That is, 50% of the horses in Texas had the beginnings of at least one cataract by the time they were 10 years of age.
Dang, that's early! The comparable figure for the horses in Essex was 20 years.
Statistically, this difference in C50 between the two locations was highly significant (P = 0.001).
Clinically — practically — this difference is also highly significant! And of great use to us, as I'll explain in a bit.
But what about dogs?
dogs
Increased UV radiation is a particular problem nearer the south pole, given the “hole in the ozone layer” or thinning of the ozone column over the Antarctic region. So, the following study comparing dogs in New Zealand (lat. 35°—47° South) with those in the UK (lat. 49°—59° North) is interesting.
Both countries have relatively high cloud cover and low incident light strength, and pet care is similar in both, but one is in the southern hemisphere, and it's not all that far from Antarctica.


In this study, the age at which 50% of the group showed signs of cataract (C50) was about 2 years earlier in the NZ dogs:
* NZ — 7.5 years of age
* UK — 9.4 years of age
Statistically, this difference was highly significant (P = 0.005).
The age at which all dogs in the group had signs of cataract was also 2 years earlier in the NZ dogs:
* NZ — 11.5 years of age
* UK — 13.5 years of age
So, the greater UV light exposure in the dogs living in the southern hemisphere brought forward the age at which cataracts begin to develop by around 2 years.
limiting UV exposure
These studies suggest that we find ways to limit UV exposure in our animals, particularly when sunlight is strongest or brightest (middle of the day), and especially in environments where reflective UV exposure is greatest (e.g., sand, water, glass, metallic surfaces).
There are now various styles of sunglasses for dogs that have UV-blocking lenses similar to those worn by people. Here's an example:

Alternatively, you could keep the dog indoors or at least in the shade during the middle of the day.
“Doggles” (dog goggles) or similar are great for when you're taking your dog somewhere in the car. Not only do they limit both direct and reflected UV radiation, they provide the eyes with wind protection in dogs who love to hang their heads out the window.
Similar riffs on human sunglasses are now available for horses, although the typical mesh fly mask or fly veil does the job well enough in most locations.

Mesh fly masks also serve to limit irritation to the eyes from flies, dust, wind, and flying objects such as flecks of hay or chaff. This basic design has been adapted to create special UV-blocking eye masks for horses with eye problems that are exacerbated by strong UV light.
Also an option for horses and other outdoor animals is to provide ample shade, whether from man-made shelters or from trees, during the brightest part of the day.

If heat is an additional concern, then confining horses indoors during the day (under fans) and turning them out at night can work well for protection from both UV radiation and excessive heat.
. . .
Diet
Degradation of the crystalline proteins that give the lens its structure and its transparency is primarily caused by oxidation. Like rust, oxidative damage in the tissues of the body can take months or years to become obvious.
Oxidation is basically the chemical process by which electrons are lost to another atom or molecule. Its opposite is reduction (gaining electrons).
'LEO goes GER' is a mnemonic device some clever person came up with that helps me remember which is which: lose electrons, oxidation (LEO); gain electrons, reduction (GER).
Both are normal processes that occur in every living cell, every moment of every day. In fact, the two go hand-in hand in a kind of biochemical dance called the 'red-ox' reaction, cycle, dynamic, or balance. The 'yin and yang' of oxidation and reduction cycle endlessly for life — as an essential mechanism of life, and thus for a lifetime.
But while oxidation is essential for energy production and numerous other functions in a cell, an excess of oxidative products — reactive oxygen species (aka oxygen-derived free radicals), reactive nitrogen species, oxidized fats and proteins, advanced glycation endproducts, etc. — can result in cell and tissue damage if it is not counteracted.
A gradual accumulation of oxidative damage is at the root of many different types of age-related disorder and disease, including age-related or 'senile' cataracts.
Hence, a diet rich in antioxidants is expected to prevent, or at least delay the onset and slow the progression of, age-related cataracts.
antioxidants
In the canine studies Prof Williams briefly reviews, the antioxidant compounds most convincingly associated with preventing or slowing cataract progression included these:
* alpha lipoic acid
* astaxanthin ( pronounced “asta-zan-thin”)
* curcuminoids (the orange-yellow pigment in turmeric, whose botanical name is Curcuma longa, hence curcumin-oids)
BTW, alpha lipoic acid may be particularly useful in animals with diabetic cataracts, as it inhibits the enzyme (aldose reductase) that converts glucose to its alcohol, sorbitol, in the lens. Sorbitol draws water into the lens, creating or contributing to diabetic cataracts.
In this situation, a manufactured form of alpha lipoic acid (i.e., commercial supplement) is preferable to natural sources — which include kidney, heart, liver, spinach, broccoli, and yeast extract — as the amount in food is very low.
The evidence for vitamin C (ascorbic acid), vitamin E (alpha tocopherol), and the amino acid L-carnitine is less persuasive, but in theory these antioxidant nutrients should be useful, too.
Here is a more comprehensive (but still not exhaustive) list of possibly useful antioxidants that show up in “vision-support” supplements for dogs and cats, with some notes on natural sources of each:
* omega-3 fatty acids — for carnivores, use fish oil or marine algae; for herbivores, use marine algae or terrestrial plant sources (flax seed, hemp seed, etc.); for omnivores, take your pick
* vitamins C and E — use natural (food) sources or analogues when possible; fresh fruits and vegetables for vitamin C (a water-soluble vitamin); animal fats, oily fish, seeds, and nuts for vitamin E (a fat-soluble vitamin)
* trace minerals — especially copper, zinc, and selenium (which needs to partner with vitamin E for optimal antioxidant capacity); best whole-food sources are organically grown vegetables and seeds/nuts; trace minerals bound (chelated, complexed) with organic molecules such as amino acids are generally better absorbed than inorganic sources
* astaxanthin — natural sources include microalgae (freshwater or marine), krill, shrimp, and salmon (i.e., seafood with the characteristic pink or red color of this antioxidant pigment)
* curcuminoids — high-quality turmeric powder is a deep orange-yellow, indicating a higher percentage of curcuminoids (a type of polyphenol) than less intensely colored turmeric powder; some suppliers provide the % curcumin(oids) on the label
Polyphenols are a diverse group of naturally occurring molecules that have at least two (and often several) carbon rings with one or more little hydroxyl (-OH) 'arms' attached, which makes them very effective antioxidants. Many different plants contain polyphenols, as we shall see.
* carotenoids — natural pigments that contribute to the red/orange/yellow color of carrots, bell peppers (capsicums to us Aussies), and many other foods in the red—yellow portion of the “color wheel”; salmon and shrimp even contain carotenoids; two specific types of carotenoid (lutein and lycopene) are discussed separately below
* quercetin — a polyphenol found in many different fruits, vegetables, leaves, seeds, and grains
* resveratrol — a polyphenol found in the skins of grapes, various berries (blueberries, blackberries, raspberries, etc.), and even peanuts
* green tea — rich in polyphenols, green tea powder is a useful herbal supplement if you want the benefits without drinking a cup of tea
* grape seed extract — a source of procyanidins (a type of polyphenol) found in many other plants, including apples and berries
* lutein — a specific type of carotenoid that contributes a yellow pigment to many different vegetables, including leafy greens, broccoli, and carrots
* lycopene — another specific carotenoid that contributes a red pigment to tomatoes and other red fruits and vegetables
* coenzyme Q10 — a naturally occurring co-factor, highest in vegetable oils, meats, fish, and nuts
Notice a theme here?
All of the antioxidant compounds on that list are found in, or derived from, food. Made by living things. Even the trace minerals, which plants and animals get from the soil, are made more available to us by first being incorporated into the living cells of the plants and animals we eat.
Generally, studies of single antioxidants or commercial combinations (e.g., “vision-care” products) add the supplement to the typical kibble diet. Compared with this standard diet of industrially produced, highly processed, high-starch junk food, it's little wonder that adding even a single antioxidant compound can work wonders!
And even then, the devil's in the details. The following graph is taken from a Korean study of senior dogs (8+ years of age) that compared two different “vision-care” supplements with a control group of dogs who received no such supplements…
Park S, Kang S, Yoo S, et al. 'Effect of oral antioxidants on the progression of canine senile cataracts: a retrospective study.' Journal of Veterinary Science, 2022; 23(3): e43.

Immature cataracts progressed to mature cataracts more slowly in dogs on Meni-One Eye R/C (pink line) or Ocu-GLO (blue line) than in dogs on no such supplements (red line).
Impressive, no? But the study was limited to dogs with 'incipient' (only just emerging) or immature cataracts. It excluded dogs with mature or advanced cataracts.
The dogs in the graph above had immature cataracts: lens opacity was greater than 15% of the lens volume, but the tapetal (that irridescent green-blue) reflection when light is shone into the eye could still be observed through the lens, and there was no shrinkage of the lens.
It's good to know that each of these antioxidant-rich supplements slowed the progression of immature to mature cataracts. But how well do they work in dogs with mature cataracts? We have no idea, as the researchers didn't look.
And what about dogs with very early or very small cataracts, termed incipient cataracts? These are the dogs with minor or localized opacity involving less than 15% of the lens volume. Here's that graph:

There were no significant differences in the rate of progression from incipient to immature cataracts among the three treatment groups.
These expensive supplements made no significant difference in the progression of incipient cataracts over the 2-year study. Statistically, the control group (on no supplements) did just as well.
As is typical of such studies, no mention is made of the dogs' diets.
But how do these antioxidant compounds and commercial products perform in an animal who is already on a species-appropriate diet of fresh, wholesome ingredients?
In my experience, not nearly as well.
That said, it's hard to argue against increasing the antioxidant content of the diet in individuals who already have some degree of lens opacity. In these animals, you can probably take your pick from the long list of potentially useful antioxidants and their sources, as there is no good research I'm aware of that has looked at the value of any of these supplements when added to an already great diet.
Also notice that there are many different types of antioxidants in whole foods, even in the one food item.
While the concentrations of antioxidants in whole foods are far less than those found in most nutritional supplements, what supplements lack — what humans have yet to perfect — is the wonderful synergy of these many different antioxidants in physiological combinations and concentrations.
Mother (Nature) really does know best.
. . .
water
And then there is the not-so-little matter of water. Kibble diets are generally less than 10% water, whereas fresh-food diets may be 70% water or more, depending on their ingredients. For example, raw meat is 60—70% water, depending on the animal species and the cut of meat; and raw vegetables are > 80% water; many are > 90% water!

Home-made chicken stew, bagged up and ready for the freezer. Ingredients: 1 whole chicken, 1 bag of frozen mixed vegetables, and just enough water for cooking.
So, even without adding any water, fresh foods contain way more water than kibbles. That's a good thing, because water is essential for life.
Particularly in relation to preventing, delaying the onset, or slowing the progression of cataracts, water facilitates the metabolism of everything in the liver and the elimination of waste via the kidneys, gut, skin, and lungs. That's because water is essential for various cellular processes and for optimal red-ox cycling.
. . .
For a fascinating look at how water behaves in living cells, I highly recommend Dr Gerald Pollack's brilliant book, Cells, Gels and the Engines of Life — a new, unifying approach to cell function (2001).
I now think of the water in fresh food as living water.
. . .
One of the seven Ds listed as known causes of cataracts is dehydration.
Prof Williams discusses this one only briefly, and he leans heavily on the medical literature about dehydration-related cataracts in people living in poor countries and suffering from severe diarrhea, heat stroke, and other such 'dehydration crises'.
Often compounding such studies, he notes, are nutritional deficiencies and exposure to bright sunlight in impoverished countries near the equator.
Well, that doesn't seem to apply to the average pet dog or cat in a developed country.
But what if the average dog or cat on the typical kibble diet is mildly yet persistently dehydrated because the water content of their diet is unnaturally low, and drinking water just doesn't completely fill the tank?
This scenario is widely accepted in cats, for example. I also see it in horses on hay-based diets (properly dried hays are < 10% water), with little or no access to fresh grass or other living plants. So, why not dogs on kibble as well?
Might that increase the risk and accelerate the progression of age-related cataracts, particularly when other factors are also in play?
I would think so.
I'm an enthusiastic advocate of fresh, species-appropriate diets for dogs and cats — heck, all animals in our care. Nutrition being a passion of mine, I wrote a book on how I fed my own dog: Feeding Miss Lilly — on feeding dogs a great, nature-inspired diet.
For cats, I highly recommend catinfo.org, which contains lots of information on feeding cats by my friend and colleague, Dr Lisa Pierson.
. . .
To wrap up this article before it gets any longer, we may not be able to prevent every cataract, but there is a lot we can do to lower the risk, delay the onset, slow the progression, and thus reduce the impact of cataracts in the animals in our care.
We may not be able to prevent every cataract, but there is a lot we can do to lower the risk, delay the onset, and slow the progression of cataracts.